Report · Culture

Three-quarters doubt presidents use supernatural powers to win votes

Reading

Most Americans (75%) say they don't really think American presidents employ supernatural powers to win acceptance among voters, an April 2025 Verasight survey finds.

Smaller shares see otherworldly forces at work: 12% say presidents align with religious entities to influence the voting population, 8% say they engage in spiritual practices only to complement conventional electoral strategies, and 7% strongly believe they apply esoteric powers during electioneering.

Topline

select all

Selected responses

Three-quarters doubt presidents use supernatural powers to win votes.

Do you think American presidents employ supernatural powers to get electoral acceptability among voters?

  • I don’t really think they do this 75.2%
  • They align with religious entities to influence the voting population among other metaphysical activities 12.1%
  • They only engage in spiritual practices to compliment other conventional electoral strategies 7.6%
  • I strongly believe they apply esoteric powers during electioneering 6.8%

2025 · base n 1,000 · +/- 3.5%

society

View source

Methodology

Full methodology
Mode
Verasight panel recruited via random address-based sampling, random person-to-person text messaging, and dynamic online targeting
Field dates
2025-04-09 → 2025-04-15
Base (unweighted)
1,000
Margin of error
+/- 3.5%
Module
society

Source

Citation

Verasight MPSA Omnibus Survey #2025-026, fielded April 9-15, 2025, N=1,000 US adults age 18+, +/- 3.5%.

https://verasight-mpsa-2025.tiiny.co

Verasight survey methodology

How Verasight conducts surveys.

This page describes the Verasight general survey contract, separate from how the Data Library packages it. When a wave report is published, its field dates, sample sizes, and module breakdown are listed in that report.

Mode
Verasight panel recruited via random address-based sampling, random person-to-person text messaging, and dynamic online targeting.
Population
US adults age 18+.
Sample design
Surveys are run as omnibus or single-topic waves. Omnibus waves are split into modules with their own respondent set, typically around one thousand respondents per module.
Field window
Each wave specifies its own field dates. Most omnibus waves field across roughly two weeks.
Weighting
Per-module weighting to CPS targets including age, race and ethnicity, sex, income, education, region, and metropolitan status.
Partisanship benchmark
Pew Research Center's NPORS benchmarking surveys, three-year running average.
Vote benchmark
2024 presidential vote population benchmarks.
Margin of error
Typically about plus or minus 3.4 to 3.6 percent per module at standard module sizes. Question-level MoE is recomputed when a base shrinks materially below the module baseline.
Reporting
The canonical report hub is reports.verasight.io. Verified legacy reports remain on their original hosts, and unpublished reports are marked pending.
Transparency
Verasight is a member of the American Association for Public Opinion Research Transparency Initiative.

The canonical report hub is reports.verasight.io; older reports may remain on verified legacy hosts.