Report · Health

Americans trust medical and university sites most for nutrition info

Reading

Nearly four-in-ten Americans (39%) say they trust hospital, medical, or university websites such as the Mayo Clinic or Healthline most for accurate information on nutrition, a Verasight survey of 3,000 U.S. adults conducted Jan. 18-24, 2024, finds.

Government sources like the USDA and CDC come next at 18%, ahead of fitness and weight-management websites (14%) and trusted friends, family, neighbors, or church groups (13%). Relatively few name news outlets or social media (8% each).

Topline

single choice

Topline distribution

Americans trust medical and university sites most for nutrition info.

Which source do you trust most to provide accurate information on nutrition? Choose one response.

  • Hospital, Medical, or University Websites – examples include Mayo Clinic, Healthline, Harvard Health 38.8%
  • Government sources - U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 18.5%
  • Fitness, Health or Weight Management Websites – examples include Livestrong, My Fitness Pal, Men’s Health, Prevention, WeightWatchers, Noom 13.9%
  • Trusted friends, family, neighbors, or church groups 12.6%
  • News – including CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox, Google News, Yahoo News, newspapers 8.3%
  • Social media – including Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube 8.0%

2024 · base n 1,000 · +/- 3.5%

Verasight Interdisciplinary Omnibus Survey #2024-006

Source report pending

Methodology

Source report pending
Mode
Verasight panel recruited via random address-based sampling, random person-to-person text messaging, and dynamic online targeting
Field dates
2024-01-18 → 2024-01-24
Base (unweighted)
1,000
Margin of error
+/- 3.5%
Module
Verasight Interdisciplinary Omnibus Survey #2024-006

Source

  • 01
    Source report pending

Citation

Verasight Interdisciplinary Omnibus Survey #2024-006, fielded January 18-24, 2024, N=1,000 United States adults, +/- 3.5%.

Source report pending

Verasight survey methodology

How Verasight conducts surveys.

This page describes the Verasight general survey contract, separate from how the Data Library packages it. When a wave report is published, its field dates, sample sizes, and module breakdown are listed in that report.

Mode
Verasight panel recruited via random address-based sampling, random person-to-person text messaging, and dynamic online targeting.
Population
US adults age 18+.
Sample design
Surveys are run as omnibus or single-topic waves. Omnibus waves are split into modules with their own respondent set, typically around one thousand respondents per module.
Field window
Each wave specifies its own field dates. Most omnibus waves field across roughly two weeks.
Weighting
Per-module weighting to CPS targets including age, race and ethnicity, sex, income, education, region, and metropolitan status.
Partisanship benchmark
Pew Research Center's NPORS benchmarking surveys, three-year running average.
Vote benchmark
2024 presidential vote population benchmarks.
Margin of error
Typically about plus or minus 3.4 to 3.6 percent per module at standard module sizes. Question-level MoE is recomputed when a base shrinks materially below the module baseline.
Reporting
The canonical report hub is reports.verasight.io. Verified legacy reports remain on their original hosts, and unpublished reports are marked pending.
Transparency
Verasight is a member of the American Association for Public Opinion Research Transparency Initiative.

The canonical report hub is reports.verasight.io; older reports may remain on verified legacy hosts.