Back to Money and Finance

76% of Americans say the U.S. economic system is rigged to favor the wealthy

Overview

76.1% of U.S. adults agree that the U.S. economic system is rigged to benefit the wealthy and well-connected at the expense of ordinary people, the sum of 43.4% who strongly agree and 32.7% who somewhat agree. Just 18.5% disagree (11.0% somewhat plus 7.5% strongly).


The strain shows up in concrete terms too. 36.0% of adults say it was sometimes (24.4%) or often (11.6%) true in the past 12 months that they worried their food would run out before they got money to buy more.

Stacked breakdown

76.1% agree the economic system is rigged to benefit the wealthy and well-connected, including 43.4% who strongly agree.

The economic system in the United States is rigged to benefit the wealthy and well-connected at the expense of ordinary people.

Strongly agree
43.4%
Somewhat agree
32.7%
Somewhat disagree
11.0%
Strongly disagree
7.5%
I’m not sure
5.4%

2026 · base n 1,000 · +/- 3.1%

Verasight AAPOR Omnibus Survey #2026-052

View source data

Three-quarters call the system rigged

76.1% of adults agree that the economic system is rigged to benefit the wealthy and well-connected at the expense of ordinary people, combining 43.4% who strongly agree and 32.7% who somewhat agree.

18.5% disagree (11.0% somewhat plus 7.5% strongly), and 5.4% are not sure.

Strong agreement peaks among the young

53.4% of adults under 30 strongly agree the system is rigged, compared with 37.5% of those 65 and older.

By region, strong agreement is highest in the Northeast (49.2%) and lowest in the South (39.5%).

Topline

36.0% of adults worried at least sometimes in the past year that their food would run out before they got money to buy more.

Within the past 12 months, we worried whether our food would run out before we got money to buy more.

  • Never true 64.1%
  • Sometimes true 24.4%
  • Often true 11.6%

2026 · base n 1,000 · +/- 3.1%

Verasight AAPOR Omnibus Survey #2026-052

View source data

Food worry reaches a third of adults

36.0% of adults say it was sometimes (24.4%) or often (11.6%) true in the past 12 months that they worried their food would run out before they got money to buy more; 64.1% say it was never true.

Men were more likely than women to say that worry never applied (71.0% vs. 57.5%).

Methodology

Full methodology
Mode
Verasight panel recruited via random address-based sampling, random person-to-person text messaging, and dynamic online targeting
Population
US adults age 18+
Field dates
2026-05-21 → 2026-05-26
Base (unweighted)
1,000
Margin of error
+/- 3.1%
Module
Verasight AAPOR Omnibus Survey #2026-052
Sponsor
Verasight
Weight variable
weight
Weighting targets
age, race/ethnicity, sex, income, education, region, metropolitan status

Sources

[2]

Citation

Verasight AAPOR Omnibus Survey #2026-052, fielded May 21-26, 2026, N=1,000 US adults age 18+, +/- 3.1%.

https://reports.verasight.io/r/aapor-2026#q-24

Verasight survey methodology

How Verasight conducts surveys.

This page describes the Verasight general survey contract, separate from how the Data Library packages it. When a wave report is published, its field dates, sample sizes, and module breakdown are listed in that report.

Mode
Verasight panel recruited via random address-based sampling, random person-to-person text messaging, and dynamic online targeting.
Population
US adults age 18+.
Sample design
Surveys are run as omnibus or single-topic waves. Omnibus waves are split into modules with their own respondent set, typically around one thousand respondents per module.
Field window
Each wave specifies its own field dates. Most omnibus waves field across roughly two weeks.
Weighting
Per-module weighting to CPS targets including age, race and ethnicity, sex, income, education, region, and metropolitan status.
Partisanship benchmark
Pew Research Center's NPORS benchmarking surveys, three-year running average.
Vote benchmark
2024 presidential vote population benchmarks.
Margin of error
Typically about plus or minus 3.4 to 3.6 percent per module at standard module sizes. Question-level MoE is recomputed when a base shrinks materially below the module baseline.
Reporting
The canonical report hub is reports.verasight.io. Verified legacy reports remain on their original hosts, and unpublished reports are marked pending.
Transparency
Verasight is a member of the American Association for Public Opinion Research Transparency Initiative.

The canonical report hub is reports.verasight.io; older reports may remain on verified legacy hosts.