What Americans think about prediction markets
Core finding
Prediction markets appear familiar to many adults, but that familiarity has not translated into broad participation.
About 68.9% are at least slightly familiar with prediction markets, while 80.3% say they never bet on them. On the broader social question, 44.8% say prediction markets cause more harm than benefit and 38.0% are not sure.
Awareness is broader than use
Roughly 68.9% of adults are at least slightly familiar with prediction markets. That includes 27.0% who are somewhat familiar and 8.6% who are very familiar.
Actual use is much lower. About 80.3% say they never bet on prediction markets, and 50.3% say they have not participated and are not interested.
Stacked breakdown
68.9% are at least slightly familiar with prediction markets.
n = 2,000 · Apr 21–23, 2026 · MoE ±2.3%
Topline
80.3% say they never bet on prediction markets.
n = 2,000 · Apr 21–23, 2026 · MoE ±2.3%
Regulation views cluster around casinos or stricter treatment
The largest regulation bucket is parity with casinos: 35.4% say prediction markets should be regulated about the same as casinos.
Another 29.4% say prediction markets should be regulated more strictly than casinos, while 9.1% say they should be regulated less strictly and 24.2% are not sure.
Social benefit remains unsettled
Views of social impact lean more negative than positive. About 44.8% say prediction markets cause more harm than benefit, compared with 17.3% who say they cause more benefit than harm.
The large 38.0% not-sure share matters because it sits alongside broader familiarity. The pattern is not simply that adults have never heard of prediction markets. It is that many remain unconvinced or undecided.
Topline
44.8% say prediction markets cause more harm than benefit.
n = 2,000 · Apr 21–23, 2026 · MoE ±2.3%
Methodology
Full methodology →| Mode | Verasight panel recruited via random address-based sampling, random person-to-person text messaging, and dynamic online targeting |
|---|---|
| Population | US adults age 18+ |
| Field dates | Apr 21–23, 2026 |
| Base (unweighted) | 2,000 |
| Margin of error | ±2.3% |
| Module | April 2026 Verasight Variety Survey |
| Sponsor | Verasight |
| Weight variable | weight |
| Weighting targets | age, race/ethnicity, sex, income, education, region, metropolitan status |
Sources
- reports.verasight.io/r/variety10126
How familiar are you with prediction markets — platforms where people buy and sell contracts based on the outcome of future events, such as elections, economic data, or world events?
- reports.verasight.io/r/variety10126
How often, if at all, do you do each of the following activities? - Bet on prediction markets
- reports.verasight.io/r/variety10126
Have you ever participated in a prediction market? Examples include Polymarket, Kalshi, PredictIt, or Metaculus.
- reports.verasight.io/r/variety10126
Compared to casinos, do you think prediction markets should be regulated more strictly, less strictly, or about the same?
- reports.verasight.io/r/variety10126
Overall, do you think prediction markets cause more benefit or more harm to society?
Cite this topic
April 2026 Verasight Variety Survey, fielded April 21-23, 2026, N=2,000 US adults age 18+, +/- 2.3%.