Back to Money

What people think about taxing wealth

Overview

U.S. adults are pessimistic about the economy, but they still show majority support for raising taxes on billionaires and large corporations.


Roughly 73% of adults agree that it would be fair to raise wealth taxes on billionaires. About 67% agree that it would be fair to raise taxes on large corporations.

Topline

36% are not sure whether Social Security will still be around in 40 years.

Do you believe that Social Security will still be around in 40 years?

  • Not sure 36.2%
  • No 34.7%
  • Yes 29.0%

2026 · base n 1,000 · +/- 3.5%

Module 2: Economics, Work, & Policy

View source data

Adults are pessimistic about the near-term economy

About 46% of adults say they feel pessimistic about the U.S. economy in the next year, including 24% who are very pessimistic and 22% who are somewhat pessimistic.

The long-term retirement outlook is also uncertain. Roughly 36% are not sure whether Social Security will still be around in 40 years, while 35% say it will not and 29% say it will.

Stacked breakdown

73% agree that raising wealth taxes on billionaires would be fair.

Do you agree or disagree that it would be fair to raise wealth taxes on billionaires?

Strongly agree
54.9%
Somewhat agree
18.0%
Neither agree nor disagree
13.4%
Somewhat disagree
6.7%
Strongly disagree
7.0%

2026 · base n 1,000 · +/- 3.5%

Module 2: Economics, Work, & Policy

View source data

Majorities say higher taxes on billionaires and corporations would be fair

About 73% of adults agree that it would be fair to raise wealth taxes on billionaires. This includes 55% who strongly agree and 18% who somewhat agree.

Support is also broad for taxing large corporations. Roughly 67% agree that it would be fair to raise taxes on large corporations, including 43% who strongly agree and 24% who somewhat agree.

Economic pessimism does not reduce support for higher taxes at the top

The money questions show pessimism and tax fairness moving together. Adults are more likely to say the economy looks weak than strong, but that does not translate into resistance to higher taxes on concentrated wealth.

The sharper pattern is that support for taxing billionaires and large corporations is much stronger than optimism about the broader economic outlook.

Methodology

Full methodology
Mode
Verasight panel recruited via random address-based sampling, random person-to-person text messaging, and dynamic online targeting
Population
US adults age 18+
Field dates
2026-03-06 → 2026-03-16
Base (unweighted)
1,000
Margin of error
+/- 3.5%
Module
Module 2: Economics, Work, & Policy
Sponsor
Verasight
Weight variable
weight
Weighting targets
age, race/ethnicity, sex, income, education, region, metropolitan status

Sources

[4]

Citation

Verasight Client Omnibus Survey #2026-044, fielded March 6-16, 2026, N=1,000 US adults age 18+, +/- 3.5%.

https://reports.verasight.io/reports/omnibus-2026-044#q-2-26

Verasight survey methodology

How Verasight conducts surveys.

This page describes the Verasight general survey contract, separate from how the Data Library packages it. Each wave's specific field dates, sample sizes, and module breakdown are listed in that wave's report.

Mode
Verasight panel recruited via random address-based sampling, random person-to-person text messaging, and dynamic online targeting.
Population
US adults age 18+.
Sample design
Surveys are run as omnibus or single-topic waves. Omnibus waves are split into modules with their own respondent set, typically around one thousand respondents per module.
Field window
Each wave specifies its own field dates. Most omnibus waves field across roughly two weeks.
Weighting
Per-module weighting to CPS targets including age, race and ethnicity, sex, income, education, region, and metropolitan status.
Partisanship benchmark
Pew Research Center's NPORS benchmarking surveys, three-year running average.
Vote benchmark
2024 presidential vote population benchmarks.
Margin of error
Typically about plus or minus 3.4 to 3.6 percent per module at standard module sizes. Question-level MoE is recomputed when a base shrinks materially below the module baseline.
Reporting
Every wave is published as a standalone report at verasight.io/reports with full instrument and methodology.
Transparency
AAPOR transparency standards.

Wave-specific methodology, full weighting variable lists, and verbatim instrument text live in each report at verasight.io/reports.