Back to Politics

Voter expectations for the 2026 midterms

Source reportMethodology

Overview

Adults leaned toward Republican control of both chambers in their 2026 midterm expectations, but the surrounding candidate and campaign context was not one-note.


About 58% expected Republicans to win control of the House, and 56% expected Republicans to win control of the Senate. In both chambers, a slim Republican majority was the single most common forecast.

Crosstab view

58% expected Republican House control and 56% expected Republican Senate control.

Thinking about the midterm elections in 2026, which party do you think will win control of the US House of Representatives?

Thinking about the midterm elections in 2026, which party do you think will win control of the US House of Representatives?

Republicans will win a slim majority
40.0%
Democrats will win a slim majority
30.7%
Republicans will win a large majority
18.1%

Thinking about the midterm elections in 2026, which party do you think will win control of the US Senate?

Republicans will win a slim majority
37.6%
Democrats will win a slim majority
31.5%
Republicans will win a large majority
18.7%

2025 · base n 1,000 · +/- 3.5%

elections

View source data

Republican control was the more common forecast

For the House, 40% expected Republicans to win a slim majority and 18% expected Republicans to win a large majority.

For the Senate, 38% expected Republicans to win a slim majority and 19% expected Republicans to win a large majority.

Stacked breakdown

65% chose the candidate described as agreeing with them on most important issues.

Which candidate would you be more likely to support for your party’s nomination:

Candidate A who agrees with you on most important issues, but who polls and experts in the district show clearly running
65.5%
Candidate B who disagrees with you on some important issues, but who polls and experts in the district show running even
34.5%

2025 · base n 1,000 · +/- 3.5%

elections

View source data

Candidate fit still mattered in the nomination frame

In a nomination-choice scenario, 65% selected the candidate described as agreeing with them on most important issues.

A separate presidential-readiness item found 64% would consider voting for a woman in the next U.S. presidential election, compared with 10% who said no and 24% who said they did not know.

Topline

About 55% of Americans recalled political ads on social media and 49% on broadcast television.

Thinking back to the 2024 Presidential elections, in which way do you recall encountering the most political advertisements?

  • Social media 54.6%
  • Broadcast television 48.9%
  • Streaming television 31.0%
  • Mailers and flyers 22.6%
  • Radio 16.6%
  • Other 6.7%

2025 · base n 1,000 · +/- 3.5%

elections

View source data

Social media and television were the dominant ad memories

Looking back to the 2024 presidential election, 55% recalled encountering political ads on social media.

Broadcast television was close behind at 49%, followed by streaming television at 31%.

Methodology

Full methodology
Mode
Verasight panel recruited via random address-based sampling, random person-to-person text messaging, and dynamic online targeting
Population
US adults age 18+
Field dates
2025-04-09 → 2025-04-15
Base (unweighted)
1,000
Margin of error
+/- 3.5%
Module
elections
Sponsor
Verasight
Weight variable
weight
Weighting targets
age, race/ethnicity, sex, income, education, region, metropolitan status

Sources

[5]
  • 01
    Thinking about the midterm elections in 2026, which party do you think will win control of the US House of Representatives?Anchors the topic in expectations for House control.reports.verasight.io/reports/verasight-mpsa-omnibus-survey-2025-026
  • 02
    Thinking about the midterm elections in 2026, which party do you think will win control of the US Senate?Adds the Senate control expectation.reports.verasight.io/reports/verasight-mpsa-omnibus-survey-2025-026
  • 03
    Which candidate would you be more likely to support for your party’s nomination:Adds a nomination choice between a candidate closer on issues and an alternative candidate.reports.verasight.io/reports/verasight-mpsa-omnibus-survey-2025-026
  • 04
    If a woman were to run in the next U.S. presidential election, would you consider voting for her?Adds a candidate-readiness measure for a future presidential election.reports.verasight.io/reports/verasight-mpsa-omnibus-survey-2025-026
  • 05
    Thinking back to the 2024 Presidential elections, in which way do you recall encountering the most political advertisements?Adds context on the channels where adults remember encountering 2024 political ads.reports.verasight.io/reports/verasight-mpsa-omnibus-survey-2025-026

Citation

Verasight MPSA Omnibus Survey #2025-026, fielded April 9-15, 2025, N=1,000 US adults age 18+, +/- 3.5%.

https://reports.verasight.io/reports/verasight-mpsa-omnibus-survey-2025-026#thinking-about-the-midterm-elections-in-2026-which-party-do-you-think-will-win-control-of-the-us-house-of-representatives

Verasight survey methodology

How Verasight conducts surveys.

This page describes the Verasight general survey contract, separate from how the Data Library packages it. Each wave's specific field dates, sample sizes, and module breakdown are listed in that wave's report.

Mode
Verasight panel recruited via random address-based sampling, random person-to-person text messaging, and dynamic online targeting.
Population
US adults age 18+.
Sample design
Surveys are run as omnibus or single-topic waves. Omnibus waves are split into modules with their own respondent set, typically around one thousand respondents per module.
Field window
Each wave specifies its own field dates. Most omnibus waves field across roughly two weeks.
Weighting
Per-module weighting to CPS targets including age, race and ethnicity, sex, income, education, region, and metropolitan status.
Partisanship benchmark
Pew Research Center's NPORS benchmarking surveys, three-year running average.
Vote benchmark
2024 presidential vote population benchmarks.
Margin of error
Typically about plus or minus 3.4 to 3.6 percent per module at standard module sizes. Question-level MoE is recomputed when a base shrinks materially below the module baseline.
Reporting
Every wave is published as a standalone report at verasight.io/reports with full instrument and methodology.
Transparency
AAPOR transparency standards.

Wave-specific methodology, full weighting variable lists, and verbatim instrument text live in each report at verasight.io/reports.