Back to Politics

Where people set limits on courts and protest

Source reportMethodology

Overview

Adults mostly reject the idea that the president should ignore court rulings when they believe doing so is in the national interest. About 62% say no.


The protest questions point in the same direction on disruptive tactics. Adults are more likely to oppose than support shouting over a megaphone to disrupt a speech or occupying campus space to block entry.

Stacked breakdown

62% say the president should not be able to ignore court rulings.

Do you think that the president should be able to ignore court rulings if they believe doing so is in the nation’s best interest?

Yes
20.6%
No
62.1%
Don't know
17.4%

2025 · base n 1,000 · +/- 3.1%

EPOVB Conference Omnibus Survey #2025-059

View source data

Court rulings remain a clear limit

About 62% say the president should not be able to ignore court rulings if they believe doing so is in the nation's best interest.

About 21% say the president should be able to ignore court rulings, and 17% say they do not know.

Stacked breakdown

52% oppose shouting over a megaphone to disrupt a speech.

How much would you support or oppose students shouting over a megaphone to disrupt a speech in a campus auditorium to protest Israel?

Strongly oppose
26.9%
Oppose
16.0%
Slightly oppose
9.3%
Neither support nor oppose
25.7%
Slightly support
7.3%
Support
7.4%
Strongly support
7.4%

2025 · base n 494 · +/- 4.4%

EPOVB Conference Omnibus Survey #2025-059

View source data

Disruptive speech tactics draw more opposition than support

For students shouting over a megaphone to disrupt a campus speech, 52% are at least slightly opposed.

About 22% are at least slightly supportive, while 26% are neither supportive nor opposed.

Stacked breakdown

65% oppose occupying campus space and preventing entry.

How much would you support or oppose students occupying an area of campus and preventing students who support Israel from entering it?

Strongly oppose
40.1%
Oppose
17.6%
Slightly oppose
7.3%
Neither support nor oppose
23.3%
Slightly support
5.5%
Support
3.1%
Strongly support
3.0%

2025 · base n 506 · +/- 4.4%

EPOVB Conference Omnibus Survey #2025-059

View source data

Blocking entry is even less supported

Occupying an area of campus and preventing students who support Israel from entering draws stronger opposition: about 65% are at least slightly opposed.

Support is lower, at about 12% at least slightly supportive.

Methodology

Full methodology
Mode
Verasight panel recruited via random address-based sampling, random person-to-person text messaging, and dynamic online targeting
Population
US adults age 18+
Field dates
2025-07-14 → 2025-07-24
Base (unweighted)
1,000
Margin of error
+/- 3.1%
Module
EPOVB Conference Omnibus Survey #2025-059
Sponsor
Verasight
Weight variable
weight
Weighting targets
age, race/ethnicity, sex, income, education, region, metropolitan status

Sources

[3]
  • 01
    Do you think that the president should be able to ignore court rulings if they believe doing so is in the nation’s best interest?Shows whether adults support presidential disregard of court rulings.reports.verasight.io/reports/epovb-conference-omnibus-survey-2025-059
  • 02
    How much would you support or oppose students shouting over a megaphone to disrupt a speech in a campus auditorium to protest Israel?Shows support or opposition for disrupting a campus speech with a megaphone.reports.verasight.io/reports/epovb-conference-omnibus-survey-2025-059
  • 03
    How much would you support or oppose students occupying an area of campus and preventing students who support Israel from entering it?Shows support or opposition for occupying campus space and blocking entry.reports.verasight.io/reports/epovb-conference-omnibus-survey-2025-059

Citation

EPOVB Conference Omnibus Survey #2025-059, fielded July 14-24, 2025, N=1,000 US adults age 18+, +/- 3.1%.

https://reports.verasight.io/reports/epovb-conference-omnibus-survey-2025-059#do-you-think-that-the-president-should-be-able-to-ignore-court-rulings-if-they-believe-doing-so-is-in-the-nation-s-best-interest

Verasight survey methodology

How Verasight conducts surveys.

This page describes the Verasight general survey contract, separate from how the Data Library packages it. Each wave's specific field dates, sample sizes, and module breakdown are listed in that wave's report.

Mode
Verasight panel recruited via random address-based sampling, random person-to-person text messaging, and dynamic online targeting.
Population
US adults age 18+.
Sample design
Surveys are run as omnibus or single-topic waves. Omnibus waves are split into modules with their own respondent set, typically around one thousand respondents per module.
Field window
Each wave specifies its own field dates. Most omnibus waves field across roughly two weeks.
Weighting
Per-module weighting to CPS targets including age, race and ethnicity, sex, income, education, region, and metropolitan status.
Partisanship benchmark
Pew Research Center's NPORS benchmarking surveys, three-year running average.
Vote benchmark
2024 presidential vote population benchmarks.
Margin of error
Typically about plus or minus 3.4 to 3.6 percent per module at standard module sizes. Question-level MoE is recomputed when a base shrinks materially below the module baseline.
Reporting
Every wave is published as a standalone report at verasight.io/reports with full instrument and methodology.
Transparency
AAPOR transparency standards.

Wave-specific methodology, full weighting variable lists, and verbatim instrument text live in each report at verasight.io/reports.