Back to Politics

Where Americans land on the Supreme Court's power

Framing

Americans hold the Supreme Court in a kind of conditional regard. They grant it real interpretive authority, but pair that with a clear appetite for checks on its power.


About 55% say the Court should decide what the Constitution means even against majority opinion, while 54% want stronger means to control its actions. Trust is soft rather than deep, and only about one in five would consider abolishing the Court.

Stacked breakdown

55.0% say the Court should interpret the Constitution even against majority opinion.

Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statement: The U.S. Supreme Court should have the right to say what the Constitution means, even when a majority of the people disagree with its decisions.

Agree strongly
26.6%
Agree somewhat
28.4%
Neither agree nor disagree
23.7%
Disagree somewhat
13.1%
Disagree strongly
8.1%

2026 · base n 1,000 · +/- 3.2%

Verasight MPSA Omnibus Survey #2026-050

View source data

Americans grant the Court real authority

55.0% agree the Court should have the right to say what the Constitution means even when a majority disagrees, including 26.6% who agree strongly and 28.4% somewhat.

A similar 53.1% agree that Court decisions must always be carried out, even if that limits Congress and the president.

Stacked breakdown

53.7% want stronger means of controlling the Court.

Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statement: It is inevitable the U.S. Supreme Court gets mixed up in politics; therefore, we ought to have stronger means of controlling the Court's actions.

Agree strongly
21.7%
Agree somewhat
32.0%
Neither agree nor disagree
26.3%
Disagree somewhat
11.1%
Disagree strongly
8.9%

2026 · base n 1,000 · +/- 3.2%

Verasight MPSA Omnibus Survey #2026-050

View source data

But they want it kept in check

53.7% agree the Court inevitably gets mixed up in politics and that the country needs stronger means of controlling it.

Opinion splits on narrowing its reach: 32.3% disagree that the Court's right to decide certain cases should be reduced, 30.7% agree, and 37.1% take neither side.

Stacked breakdown

56.2% reject doing away with the Court over unpopular decisions.

Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statement: If the U.S. Supreme Court started making a lot of decisions people disagreed with, it might be better to do away with the Supreme Court altogether.

Agree strongly
8.5%
Agree somewhat
12.7%
Neither agree nor disagree
22.6%
Disagree somewhat
21.3%
Disagree strongly
34.9%

2026 · base n 1,000 · +/- 3.2%

Verasight MPSA Omnibus Survey #2026-050

View source data

Trust is soft, but abolition is a step too far

Trust is lukewarm: 45.5% agree the Court can usually be trusted to decide what is right for the country, while 29.5% disagree and 25.0% take neither side.

The limits of frustration are clear: 56.2% reject doing away with the Court if it made unpopular decisions, while 21.2% would be open to it.

Methodology

Full methodology
Mode
Verasight panel recruited via random address-based sampling, random person-to-person text messaging, and dynamic online targeting
Population
US adults age 18+
Field dates
2026-06-21 → 2026-06-21
Base (unweighted)
1,000
Margin of error
+/- 3.2%
Module
1
Sponsor
Verasight
Weight variable
weight
Weighting targets
age, race/ethnicity, sex, income, education, region, metropolitan status

Sources

[5]

Citation

Verasight MPSA Omnibus Survey #2026-050, fielded June 21-21, 2026, N=1,000 US adults age 18+, +/- 3.2%.

https://reports.verasight.io/r/mpsa26#q-76

Verasight survey methodology

How Verasight conducts surveys.

This page describes the Verasight general survey contract, separate from how the Data Library packages it. When a wave report is published, its field dates, sample sizes, and module breakdown are listed in that report.

Mode
Verasight panel recruited via random address-based sampling, random person-to-person text messaging, and dynamic online targeting.
Population
US adults age 18+.
Sample design
Surveys are run as omnibus or single-topic waves. Omnibus waves are split into modules with their own respondent set, typically around one thousand respondents per module.
Field window
Each wave specifies its own field dates. Most omnibus waves field across roughly two weeks.
Weighting
Per-module weighting to CPS targets including age, race and ethnicity, sex, income, education, region, and metropolitan status.
Partisanship benchmark
Pew Research Center's NPORS benchmarking surveys, three-year running average.
Vote benchmark
2024 presidential vote population benchmarks.
Margin of error
Typically about plus or minus 3.4 to 3.6 percent per module at standard module sizes. Question-level MoE is recomputed when a base shrinks materially below the module baseline.
Reporting
The canonical report hub is reports.verasight.io. Verified legacy reports remain on their original hosts, and unpublished reports are marked pending.
Transparency
Verasight is a member of the American Association for Public Opinion Research Transparency Initiative.

The canonical report hub is reports.verasight.io; older reports may remain on verified legacy hosts.